So there is still a strong incentive to either sacrifice a trinket slot for the stress lock or to build without religious fighters and avoid the situation all together.Īs is, the only callback to the old lore is that his damage boosting campfire skill causes like 10 extra stress to religious members, and I feel like that isn't a strong enough penalty to really replace the complete refusal to party together. That would allow comps that use him as a self-sufficient stun-bot with AoE blights to go unhindered alongside religious members, but if you are ever in a truly dire situation where you need that big damage to survive, it comes at a grave cost. Going into forest again, without Pevrel this time. 89 - Follows: 48 - Updated: - Published: - Status. Like I’m talking 50-100 stress, just an instant affliction pretty much. A complete run of Darkest Dungeon, writing one in-character diary entry per in-game week from a rotating cast of warriors, scholars. So, as a compromise that let’s abomination party with the other heroes but still preserves his lore, what if upon transformation, the stress dealt to religious party members was cranked up to 11. On the other hand though, we lose out on what I feel was one of the game’s strongest examples of storytelling through mechanics, since the refusal to party together said so much about the religious heroes and added so much more tragedy to the abomination’s condition. On one hand, abomination is one of my favorite classes and it’s amazing to have him receive the incredible indirect buff of being able to party with vestles.
This is something I’ve always have mixed feeling about. As of CoM, religious heroes have become open minded and decided that it’s okay to party with abominations.
0 kommentar(er)
